By Bill Lockhart
Like you, I read when it comes to making a major decision about camera equipment.
And I found reviews of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 that peaked my interest.
First, is the review by David Clapp, a UK landscape photographer of whom I have the highest respect: http://www.davidclapp.co.uk/blog/reviews/43-panasonic-gf-1-in-the-landscape.html
His comments: “Finally a top quality, light weight landscape camera has been born. As a backup to a 21mp system or as a trip based on the walk than the photos (is there such a thing?) the GF-1 is a superb camera only held back by your own imagination.”
Second, is the review by Jim Radcliff, an outstanding photographer, whose images I greatly admire: http://www.boxedlight.com/gf1/index.htm
Third, were the comments of E.J. Piker, a truly world class photographer, who praises the GF1.
So, I bought one, along with four lenses and the EVF. It set me back a great deal of money, but the quest is about a light weight system that produces high quality images. I have lusted for the Leica M9, but wow it is expensive and Leica lenses cost as much as a good used car. So, is the GF1 the poor man’s Leica?
Early Morning at Safety Harbor
Click on Photograph for a larger version.
Panasonic 14-45mm
And another image caught just at sunrise, a bit south of the first one.
Click on Photograph for a larger version.
Panasonic 7-14mm
A family of Black Snakes live in my yard, I enjoy watching them as they hunt. Black Snakes are excellent critters, they kill Rattle Snakes, Rats, and other varmints. It is good to have them around.
Click on Photograph for a larger version.
Panasonic 45-200mm
In sum, I have a kit that will go from 7-200mm (14-400mm, 35mm equivalent) in a package that weighs less than three pounds! WOW, I thought, how good this will be when my colleagues decide they want me to hike with them four miles to a lighthouse along a rocky shore!
Or, while sitting in a garden.
Click on Photograph for a larger version.
Panasonic 45-200mm
If you want complete information about all the stuff this camera will do, read the excellent review at DPReview. As with any decision, it is best to get lots of opinions before making a purchase.
For me, there are three considerations that matter:
1. Weight and size.
2. Ease of use with lots of manual controls.
3. Image quality.
The GF1 scores high for weight and size, perfect for travel photography. It will fit in a small camera bag and it won’t break your back during long walks!
Ease of use and lots of manual controls. Here there are issues. Yes, it has just about any option one could want in a camera with plenty of ways to tailor the kit to one’s liking. But, the camera manual is poorly written and sometimes footnotes are more important than the text trying to describe what each function does. Panasonic needs to hire a photographer to rewrite the manual.
As to image quality, I am not displeased, but I am not ready to conclude as has E.J. Piker that the camera has better image quality then the Canon 1Ds or the Canon 5D. For me, the jury is still out.
The real advantage to this camera system came this summer when I again visited Scotland and undertook some major hikes (for me they are major) up and down hills and sand dunes, across boggy heather, through paths filled with stones and obstacles. Three pounds instead of the 20 pounds I normally carry was a pleasure.
Click on Photograph for a larger version.
Panasonic 7-14mm
Beach Silhouette, Isle of Lewis
Click on Photograph for a larger version.
Panasonic 7-14mm
Camas Uig Bay, Isle of Lewis, Scotland
Click on Photograph for a larger version.
Panasonic 7-14mm
Click on Photograph for a larger version.
Panasonic 14-45mm
Lighthouse, Butt of Lewis, Isle of Lewis, Scotland
Click on Photograph for a larger version.
Panasonic 7-14mm
Out of the Mist
Click on Photograph for a larger version.
Panasonic 45-200mm
I found that the GF1 is also useful when photographing animals using the fabulous 45-200mm lens. As in this shot done through a Plexiglas window at a zoo in Scotland. A eagerly await the Panasonic 100-300mm lens due out in September. Given the 2X factor of the four thirds system, this means I will have a small lens that will give me an effective 200-600mm range in the 35mm equivalent! That will be fantastic as a wildlife lens.
A Snow Monkey in Scotland
Click on Photograph for a larger version.
Panasonic 45-200mm
Good photography has nothing to do with 21MP sensors, it is about finding the light that dances and having the patience to see light in creative ways. Each camera has its own merits, and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 has plenty to consider.
So far, the system has worked well.
Ease of use, size, weight, quality of images — it is an excellent travel camera, especially for those times when one must make a long trek to some special spot.
The GF1 won’t replace my Canon 5D Mark II, but it will remain part of my camera kit for many years to come.
Eilean Glas Lighthouse, Isle of Harris, Scotland
Click on Photograph for a larger version.
Panasonic 7-14mm
Following my latest trip to Scotland, I bought the Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 lens to add to the array of capabilities of the system. My impression so far is that this lens, in particular, is a good match for the camera, providing opportunities for low light shooting and adding greatly to the compactness of the camera. If I were to use one lens with the GF1, it is the one I would choose.
And, I must add that the camera does wonderful videos, giving me HD quality good enough to use for serious video production. That capability, along with the ability to use hundreds of lenses with adapters, makes the GF1 special as a tool for travel photography.
In the days ahead, I will be using the GF1 constantly. Please read future articles and note which shots were done with it.
In sum, yes, the Panasonic GF1 is the poor man’s Leica!



















Pingback: GPS Navigation System - Navigation with a Compass and GPS – Part 2 - Free Shipping
Nice article Bill. I’m currently torn between GF1 + 45 mm Macro and Canon 5D II + 100 mm L Macro. I enjoy Macro photography the most. The former is $1300 and the latter is $3500! Is the double price really worth it for the 5D II? Perhaps I could start with the GF1 and develop my skill before moving to full frame. Or why waste money on micro 4/3 when I can go full frame right away. Ahhhhhh…..can’t decide. Please provide some input. I currently shoot with Panny LX3.
Thanks.
Hi Monty,
If money is not a major concern, I would buy the Canon 5D Mark II. There is a significant difference in image quality. My interest in the GF1 relates to weight and size. It is a wonderful camera, but it cannot compete with the 5D II.
Best regards,
Bill
Monty hi, Bill you too,
the 5D Mk II is the best by all means. But consider the bulk you have to carry and i am personally not keen on that…since you are shooting with an LX3 (great little thing) and you prefer macro i would personally go with the GF1 which is already in my list of immenent purhcases. I had the opportunity to test it and live with it for a month. Getting it around is great and i would get it as soon as i sell my current gear to allow for the budget.
Also i would not forget that you are used to carrying around your LX3 (as i do my G7) and carrying a bag with your 5D will be Ok for a while but you will be fed up with it soon….especially since you can get very good results with smaller, carry around in your pocket or backpack cameras… so consider both options as good for your upgrade and look at the additional equipment you may buy for the excess budget like lenses? a good macro light to complement your lens, filters and the list goes on…My choice is the GF1…
another camera to consider if you are set that you need a bigger format is the samsung NX10! APS-c format and great manual overides…small sized to carry around and samsung is also a great maker if you are not stuck with names like canon and nikon like i was…I have and still carry around a Samsung NV-24 which is a great little thing like the LX3…fits on my shirt pocket so i dont miss out on daily opps!! after all…size matters!!!
take care…nickolas
Take care and happy shooting
Hi Bill,
I am (proud) owner of GF1, with both pancake 20mm and 45-200 lens. I never had the opportunity to buy a good camera, so I am not a good shooter at all. I bought this camera on march to document my trips.
Im always learning in the internet how to get the best from my kit (you can see some results on http://goo.gl/QjkYl)
Your pictures are awesome, really art work. Congratulations.
I want to do some macro work. I was considering to buy the leica 14-45 or the 45, and maybe an adapter to use Canon 50mm or Nikon lenses in my GF1.
I also liked the sony nex-5 cam, it have a nice 18-200mm lens. Maybe I should change my 45-200 for a macro one, and buy this sony kit as second camera.
as you have many lens for panny, what you think it would worth? Money is an issue, haha, but I could spend some to have a good set of camera.
thanks in advance, and once again congratulations, very nice shots. thanks for sharing with us,
Marco
Hi Marco,
Choosing the right lens combination for a camera is always filled with questions. My advice is to use what you have. Practice, practice, practice.
If you buy an adapter to fit a Canon or Nikon lens remember that you cannot set the aperture, older Canon lenses such as the FD ones are different and allow you to set aperture. I bought a Canon adapter to try out my Canon EF lenses and was disappointed because of this.
In sum, ask yourself the question: “What is it that I want to photograph?” The answer pretty much determines the lenses you should buy.
I have looked at your photographs, seems to me you are doing very well with your work. Keep it up.
Good luck in your decisions.
Best regards,
Bill